The Human Face of Permitting Delays

When we talk about permitting delays, we often focus on processes, regulations, and technology. But behind every delayed permit is a human story—overworked reviewers, impossible workloads, and a mounting sense that the system is failing both public servants and the public they serve.

This article explores the workforce crisis that underpins America's permitting challenges—and why solving it requires more than just hiring more people.

The Numbers Tell a Story

The Retirement Wave

The federal workforce is aging, and experienced employees are leaving at significant rates. According to the Office of Personnel Management, approximately 30% of the federal workforce is currently eligible for retirement, with that percentage increasing each year.

In permit offices specifically, the situation is acute. Senior reviewers who understand how regulations interact—who can spot issues before they become problems—are walking out the door with their institutional knowledge.

State and local governments face similar challenges. A 2022 survey by the Center for State and Local Government Excellence found that 75% of state and local governments reported difficulty filling positions, with building and permit-related roles among the hardest to staff.

Training Gap

Becoming a proficient permit reviewer isn't quick. Depending on the complexity of the jurisdiction:

• Basic competency: 6-12 months
• Independent work: 1-2 years
• Expert-level proficiency: 5+ years

When experienced staff retire faster than new staff can be trained, backlogs grow. When backlogs grow, remaining staff face more pressure. When pressure increases, more people leave. It's a vicious cycle.

Budget Constraints

Most permit offices are funded through application fees. When economic conditions slow development, fee revenue drops—often precisely when backlogs are already high. This creates a predictable but painful cycle:

1. Economy slows, fee revenue drops
2. Staff reductions or hiring freezes implemented
3. Backlogs grow during slowdown
4. Economy recovers
5. Application surge hits understaffed office
6. Delays worsen dramatically
7. Political pressure mounts
8. Emergency hiring begins—but training takes years

What We Hear from Reviewers

In conversations with permit professionals across the country, consistent themes emerge:

"I can't keep up with the changes"

"Every month there's a new code update, a new interpretation, a new policy memo. I'm supposed to know thousands of pages of regulations, and they keep changing. It's impossible to stay current."

"I spend more time researching than reviewing"

"For every hour I spend actually evaluating an application, I spend two hours looking up requirements, cross-referencing codes, and documenting my analysis. The actual review is the easy part."

"Nobody sees what we prevent"

"When I catch a fire safety issue or a structural problem, nobody celebrates. It's invisible. But when a permit takes an extra week because I'm being thorough, everyone complains. The incentives are backwards."

"I don't have time to train new people"

"We hired someone six months ago. She's smart and motivated. But I barely have time to review my own applications, let alone mentor her properly. She's going to take three years to get up to speed instead of one."

Why "Just Hire More People" Doesn't Work

The obvious solution—hire more permit reviewers—faces several obstacles:

Talent Pool Constraints

Not many people grow up dreaming of careers in permit review. The work requires specific technical knowledge (building codes, zoning regulations, environmental requirements) combined with customer service skills, attention to detail, and sound judgment.

Universities don't produce "permit reviewers" the way they produce engineers or accountants. Each jurisdiction trains its own, which takes years of investment.

Compensation Competition

Public sector salaries often can't compete with private industry. An experienced plan reviewer might earn 30-50% more as a construction consultant or working for a development firm. The expertise is valuable—and the private sector knows it.

Institutional Knowledge Is Irreplaceable

You can hire someone to read codes. You can't hire someone who knows:

• Which code sections interact in non-obvious ways
• What issues commonly arise with specific building types
• How previous decisions established precedent
• Which contractors submit reliable work and which need extra scrutiny
• How to interpret ambiguous requirements based on the code's intent

This knowledge develops only through experience—and it walks out the door with every retirement.

How Technology Changes the Equation

Here's our perspective: the solution isn't asking permit reviewers to work harder. They're already stretched thin. The solution is giving them tools that eliminate unnecessary friction.

What AI Can Handle

Research and cross-referencing. Instead of spending two hours looking up requirements, AI can surface the relevant code sections in seconds—with citations.

Completeness checking. Before an application reaches a human reviewer, AI can verify that all required documents are present and properly formatted. Catching missing items upfront saves multiple review cycles.

Change tracking. When regulations update, AI can automatically identify affected applications and alert reviewers to new requirements.

Documentation. AI can draft review notes, citing specific code sections, for human verification and approval. The reviewer's job becomes checking and refining rather than starting from scratch.

What Humans Must Handle

Judgment calls. When regulations are ambiguous or requirements conflict, human expertise is essential. This is where professional discretion matters.

Discretionary decisions. Variances, exceptions, and novel interpretations require professional judgment that can't be automated.

Stakeholder communication. Explaining requirements to applicants, negotiating solutions, and building relationships—these are fundamentally human skills.

Quality assurance. Reviewing AI-generated analysis and making final determinations ensures accountability stays with qualified professionals.

The Multiplier Effect

When AI handles research, documentation, and routine checks, each reviewer becomes dramatically more productive:

"We see AI co-pilots making each reviewer 3-5x more effective on routine applications—not by replacing their expertise, but by handling the work that doesn't require it."

This changes the hiring math entirely. Instead of needing 10 new reviewers, an office might achieve the same capacity improvement with 3-4 new hires plus AI tools.

More importantly, it changes the job itself. Reviewers can focus on the interesting, challenging work that drew them to the profession—not the tedious research that burns them out.

A Better Path Forward

The permit office workforce crisis is real, and it won't resolve quickly. But agencies have options:

Short-Term

• Deploy AI tools to amplify existing staff capacity
• Prioritize training time by reducing research burden on mentors
• Implement better workflow management to reduce frustration

Medium-Term

• Develop career pathways that retain experienced staff
• Create mentorship programs enabled by reduced workload pressure
• Build institutional knowledge bases that capture expertise before it retires

Long-Term

• Redesign job descriptions to emphasize judgment and expertise
• Partner with community colleges and universities on pipeline programs
• Advocate for sustainable funding models that don't boom and bust

The Human Element

At its core, permit review is about protecting public health, safety, and welfare. The people who do this work care about their communities. They want to help projects succeed—safely and sustainably.

They deserve tools that let them focus on what they do best, not systems that bury them in busywork until they burn out and leave.

Technology isn't the enemy of human expertise. Used correctly, it's the force multiplier that lets human expertise shine.

---

Binoloop's Atlas platform is designed to reduce reviewer burnout by handling research, cross-referencing, and documentation automatically. Our AI helps permit professionals focus on the decisions that actually require their expertise. See how it works.

---

References

1. Office of Personnel Management. (2023). FedScope Employment Cubes. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. https://www.opm.gov/data/

2. Center for State and Local Government Excellence. (2022). State and Local Government Workforce Survey. https://slge.org/

3. International Code Council. (2023). Building Department Administration Survey. ICC Research. https://www.iccsafe.org/

4. MissionSquare Research Institute. (2022). State and Local Government Workforce Trends. https://slge.org/research/

5. National League of Cities. (2023). State of City Budgets Report. https://www.nlc.org/